- 0xResearch
- Posts
- The Debasement Trade
Hey all, happy Tuesday!
BTC and gold outperformed as equities fell yesterday, offering an early glimpse of a debasement trade as the Treasury expands long-dated debt buybacks. We also look at META’s Korea-led rally and an overlooked ICO opportunity, before unpacking Solana’s first slot-time reduction since genesis and two major proposals seeking to strengthen SOL’s value accrual.
Bitcoin outperformed traditional benchmarks yesterday, gaining 1.35%. Gold followed at 1.09%, while US equities closed in the red, with the S&P 500 down 0.38% and the Nasdaq 100 down 1.18%. The simultaneous rally in BTC and gold, particularly against weaker equities, looks like the early stages of a debasement trade.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reinforced that case yesterday. He confirmed that Treasury will proceed with last week’s surprise expansion of long-dated debt buybacks, doubling repurchases of 10- to 30-year securities from $2B to at least $4B per operation beginning Sep. 10, while maintaining its regular auction schedule.
The change came immediately after the 30-year yield reached a nearly two-decade high, and Bessent has explicitly argued that higher long-term yields do not reflect underlying fundamentals.
Stanley Druckenmiller, Bessent’s longtime mentor, sharply criticized the move in a Wall Street Journal op-ed this morning. He argued that the Treasury is using liquidity tools to manage prices in a normally functioning market, weakening the country’s “last fiscal disciplinarian” and delaying the only durable solution: addressing the primary deficit.
Within crypto, BTC outperformed every sector index except Launchpad and AI. On the launchpad side, VIRTUAL (+8.88%) and MetaDAO’s META (+3.87%) were the top performers.
META traded as much as 40% higher this morning, with Upbit accounting for 74% of volume and Bithumb another 13%. With 87% of activity concentrated on Korean exchanges, the rally looks primarily driven by a speculative Korean bid.
Even so, META could soon benefit from an actual fundamental catalyst. It remains underdiscussed that the SEC’s proposed Regulation Crypto Assets could pave the way for ICOs to return in a major way, with MetaDAO already positioned to capture that activity. Based on fundraising amounts alone, 16 of MetaDAO’s 20 ICOs would have fallen below the proposed $5M startup-exemption limit as drafted, while all 20 would have fit within Tier 1 of the fundraising exemption.
Sometimes price leads the narrative. This rally may be speculative, but it could be the catalyst that brings MetaDAO’s more fundamental opportunity into focus.
— Carlos
Solana: Faster Slots, First Votes
On Aug. 21, Solana cut its target slot time from 400ms to 350ms. It marked the first reduction since genesis and the first stage of SIMD 525, merged in May, which lays out four sequential 50ms steps towards a 200ms slot time target. Observed slot times settled around 360ms in the days after, slightly above target, which is expected given that the parameter governs the interval leaders are given to produce blocks rather than guaranteeing uniform block arrival.
The implications of shorter slot times compound as the target time descends. At 350ms they are marginal, but a 200ms target cuts the leader window to 0.8 seconds, which constrains late packing far more meaningfully and narrows the horizon over which a leader can profitably delay a transaction. It also halves the interval a quote sits exposed between blocks, mechanically reducing adverse selection against onchain liquidity priced off external references. Costs, however, run the other direction, with propagation margins tightening for remotely located validators, which may concentrate stake geographically.
Alongside this, SIMD 550 and SIMD 553, two heavily discussed proposals aimed at improving SOL’s value accrual, progressed to the voting stage on Solana’s new governance platform, following a successful support and discussion phase. Both cleared the 15% active stake bar and voting opened onchain on Aug. 22. Both voting periods run through the end of epoch 1023, currently expected around 15:30 UTC on Aug. 27. They are also sharing the ballot with SGP 001, the ratification of the Solana Constitution, which serves as the canonical document governing Solana's network-level decision making.
As of today, both proposals are short of the one third of stake needed to reach quorum, although both are comfortably above the approval threshold. SGP 002 has 75.48M SOL for, 1.428M against, and 845k abstaining, which puts 77.75M SOL cast against a 144.50M SOL quorum requirement. SGP 003 sits at 62.20M for, 1.239M against, and 144k abstaining, or 63.58M cast against the same 144.50M SOL quorum. Helius is the largest voter on SGP 002 at 16.05M SOL, representing 3.69% of total stake, while Staking Facilities leads SGP 003 at 6.547M SOL, 1.50% of stake. Reaching quorum from here requires large operators who have so far stayed out to participate.
SIMD 550, stylized as SGP 002, aims to double SOL's disinflation rate from -15% per year to -30% per year. Helius's Lostin and Ichigo put it forward as a cleaner version of SIMD 411: the 8% initial rate and 1.5% terminal rate both stay exactly where they are, and only the speed of decay doubles. That halves the time to terminal inflation from 5.7 years, or H1 2032, to 2.8 years, or H1 2029. Helius puts the emissions saved at roughly 18.9M SOL over six years, with nominal staking yields at a 68% staking rate falling from 5.84% to 4.34%, then 3.00%, then 2.25% over the first three years.
SIMD 553, stylized as SGP 003, rebuilds the base fee from the ground up. Temporal's Cavey proposes replacing today's 5,000 lamports per signature with two components: a flat 2,500 lamport inclusion fee per transaction paid entirely to the block leader, and a resource fee priced off requested cost units and burned in full. Priority fees are untouched and still go entirely to the leader per SIMD 96. The resource fee is burned in full rather than shared with leaders and charged on requested rather than consumed cost units, which keeps the total fee knowable before execution and hands senders a direct financial reason to stop padding their compute budgets.
The two proposals attack opposite ends of the same problem, one throttling supply and the other building a sink that scales with demand, so they complement each other rather than compete.
— Toma
The Hyperliquid Policy Center argues that perpetual contracts should be classified based on their economic structure rather than the asset they reference. Standardized, fungible perps that trade on an order book, can be exited by offset, use margin, and rely on funding payments to keep prices anchored exhibit the traditional characteristics of futures contracts.
Under that framework, an equity perp should be eligible to be treated as a security future, rather than automatically as a security-based swap, just as structurally identical BTC or commodity perps can be futures. HPC argues this would create a clearer path for bringing equity perps onshore, allow them to reach US investors through the existing joint SEC-CFTC security-futures framework, and reduce regulatory fragmentation between economically similar products.
Smac from Compound argues that investors often mistake a valuation multiple for a complete signal when it actually bundles together two very different things: business quality and the duration of future growth. His core framework is that forward returns come from fundamental growth and multiple change, and the biggest opportunities come from correctly separating those variables before the market does. He distinguishes fundamental investing from traditional “value” investing, then uses a four-quadrant matrix to show how apparently expensive or cheap assets can be either genuinely mispriced or correctly priced. His broader view is that markets may become less efficient, not more, as AI commoditizes legible analysis while narratives, judgment, and long-duration expectations drive larger perception gaps.
