Hi all, happy Wednesday! A one-page peace framework landed on Tehran's desk and markets ripped, with semis printing fresh records and Brent crude briefly cratering 11% before finding its footing.

Today, we also dig into the quieter structural story: two very different visions for tokenized equity emerging in the span of a week, and why both bypass the depository that has sat at the center of US capital markets for half a century.

Markets rallied broadly on Tuesday as surging semiconductor stocks drove Wall Street's tech indices to fresh records, while peace hopes in the Middle East gathered momentum. The NASDAQ 100 gained 2.11% and the S&P 500 rose 1.12%, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor index climbing as much as 4.8% to another all-time high.

The peace story accelerated dramatically today as Axios reported that Washington had presented Iran with a one-page framework for ending the war, expecting a response within 48 hours. The proposed deal would reportedly involve Tehran agreeing to a moratorium on nuclear enrichment in exchange for the release of frozen funds and sanctions relief, with both sides ending restrictions on Strait of Hormuz transit. Brent crude plunged as much as 11% to below $98, its lowest since April 22, before recovering to around $101 after Trump posted that the war would end if Iran agreed to terms but warned of intensified strikes otherwise. Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps said it would allow safe passage through the strait under new protocols, though details remained vague. The diplomatic push came a day after Trump paused the US military's "Project Freedom" operation to guide ships through the strait, a mission that had lasted just one day and involved exchanges of fire between US and Iranian forces.

In Europe on Tuesday, the picture was split. The Stoxx 600 rose 0.7% and Germany's Dax gained 1.7%, but London's FTSE 100 fell 1.4% after reopening from a bank holiday. Gold climbed 1.62%.

Bitcoin rose 1.27%, and the crypto market was overwhelmingly green. Meme tokens surged 25.1%, followed by the Privacy Index (+10.7%) and Crypto Miners (+5.3%). Perps, Oracle, Launchpad, DePIN, and DeFi all gained between 3.8% and 4.5%. Nearly every sector was positive, with only Crypto Equities (-3.1%) and the 2025 Crypto Equity Cohort (-3.6%) in the red, continuing their persistent underperformance relative to the rest of the market.

— Boccaccio

Two Roads to Tokenized Equity

Securitize and Computershare announced that US-listed issuers can now mint Issuer-Sponsored Tokens (ISTs) alongside their existing shares. Computershare is the transfer agent for close to 60% of the S&P 500, including Apple, Tesla, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Coinbase. Six days later, Bullish unveiled a $4.2 billion deal to acquire Equiniti, another global transfer agent with roughly 3,000 issuer clients and 20 million shareholders on its books. 

Both deals went after the registry layer. Neither went after DTCC. That is the part that got me thinking.

The DTCC route: tokenized entitlements

In December, the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets issued a no-action letter clearing DTC to launch a pilot of its tokenization services. Under DTC's model, the underlying security never leaves DTC custody. What gets minted is a tokenized entitlement, a token representing a DTC participant's security entitlement. The legal characterization of ownership doesn't change, and the token is, functionally, an alternative way to instruct DTC to record a transfer on its own books. DTC retains root wallet authority to reverse transactions, the tokens carry no collateral or settlement value in DTC's risk-management processes, and only DTC participants (broker-dealers and custodians) can hold them. The chain is a transport layer bolted to a centralized ledger that already custodies more than $114 trillion in assets.

The transfer-agent route: tokens as the share itself

The Securitize–Computershare and Bullish–Equiniti models work the other way around. Rather than tokenizing entitlements that live inside the depository, they tokenize at the registry. The Issuer-Sponsored Token is the share, recorded by the transfer agent. It is not a wrapper, a derivative or a synthetic claim on a custodial chain. It is a registered share that happens to live in a wallet, with full voting rights and direct issuer-to-shareholder corporate actions.

The tradeoffs

The DTCC model has scale, regulatory comfort, and a clean answer to the question of where the system of record lives — it lives where it has always lived. If Goldman, Citi, BNY, and the rest of the DTC participant base are already there, tokenized entitlements inherit that depth on day one. The cost is that almost nothing about the holding experience changes for end investors. The token cannot leave the universe of DTC participants, and the underlying chain of intermediaries remains intact. It is tokenization as a settlement-rail upgrade, not a disintermediation event.

The transfer-agent model is the more architecturally ambitious of the two. It moves the canonical record onto a blockchain and gives investors the option of holding shares the way they hold stablecoins, with corporate actions and votes flowing into the wallet rather than through nominee structures. The cost is a liquidity question that has not been answered. Tokens have to sit alongside traditional shares; the broker, exchange, and clearing houses still have to integrate the two, and tokenized pools risk being thinner than traditional ones until that wiring matures. Bullish's own announcement acknowledges this directly, citing planned interoperability with DTCC, Euroclear, and Clearstream.

Where this goes

These models are not mutually exclusive. A share can plausibly exist as both a DTC-custodied entitlement and an issuer-sponsored token, and the transfer-agent camp is openly designing for coexistence with the depository rather than around it. But the two paths reflect a genuine philosophical split. DTCC is asking whether blockchain can make existing capital markets infrastructure faster and more programmable. Securitize, Bullish, and the transfer agents they have aligned with are asking whether the depository layer is the right place for the canonical record of equity ownership in a world where balance sheets increasingly live in wallets.

The answer is unlikely to be binary. But the fact that the two largest US transfer agents have now publicly aligned with the second vision suggests the question is finally being asked at the right altitude.

— Marc

1. Finance Is Entering Its Autonomous Era

Software is shifting from a tool that assists humans to an autonomous actor that executes complex workflows. To address the lack of financial infrastructure designed for non-human entities, Anchorage Digital has introduced Agentic Banking, a regulated framework that provides AI agents with secure identity, policy enforcement, and capital access. Through a new partnership with Google Cloud, Anchorage will act as the settlement and compliance layer for Google’s agentic intelligence protocols. By combining a federal banking charter with cloud-native infrastructure, the collaboration establishes a controlled gateway for AI to participate directly in economic activity while maintaining institutional oversight and risk management.

2. HIP-4 Is Not a Prediction Market — It's the Options Layer

Hyperliquid has launched HIP-4, a new primitive for outcome contracts that introduces a fully collateralized options and prediction market layer directly to its L1 blockchain. Unlike standalone platforms like Polymarket, HIP-4 integrates with Hyperliquid’s existing derivatives engine, allowing for unified margin where traders can use the same collateral to back perps, spot, and binary options simultaneously. This structural advantage enables advanced financial use cases beyond simple betting, such as parametric insurance, credit default swaps, and complex hedging strategies, all while benefiting from lower fees and the platform's established liquidity. By partnering with industry experts and leveraging its high-performance order book, Hyperliquid is positioning HIP-4 as a foundational layer for programmable, event-driven finance.