- 0xResearch
- Posts
- IPO Summer Scaries
IPO Summer Scaries
Pre-IPO perps just got their first miss

Markets looked weak on the surface, but the internals were more interesting than the headline moves suggested.
Crypto majors held up over the weekend despite a sharp Friday selloff in equities, while dispersion across sectors remains extreme. Miners are still the standout on a one-year basis.
At the same time, TradeXYZ’s pre-IPO markets are entering a more important phase.

Majors held firm over the weekend with BTC down 0.7% while meme (+4.0%) and RWA (+3.3%) led. They shrugged off an ugly Friday on Wall Street, where the Nasdaq fell 4.7% and the S&P 500 2.7% on a hot May jobs report (172K vs. 88K), reviving Fed hike bets. Crypto prices did pick up Sunday afternoon as Trump once again implied the Iran war would soon be over with HYPE and ZEC again leading the charge.

Zoom out to one year and the dispersion is staggering. Crypto miners are up 217.9%, lapping the Nasdaq (+33.2%), gold (+30.5%), and the S&P (+23.2%) even as BTC fell 41.7%. Perps (+64.1%) and meme (+28.8%) are the only other green sectors; nearly everything else is worse off, such as modular (-84.8%), and the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems (near -75%).

Inside the miners index, the AI pivot did the work. Hut 8 (+505%), Cipher (+442%), TeraWulf (+430%), and IREN (+426%) led, repurposing power and data centers for AI and high-performance computing as hyperscaler demand exploded. The names with less believable pivots tracked BTC down instead: Marathon -24%, Bit Digital -38%, and Argo -96%.

IREN is the cleanest expression of the trade with the shares resilient even after this recent downleg in BTC. The former bitcoin miner signed a $9.7B, five-year deal with Microsoft to deploy Nvidia GB300 clusters at its Childress, Texas campus, worth ~$1.94B in annual run-rate revenue. Q1 FY26 revenue hit $240.3M, up 355% YoY, as HPC is projected to reach a majority of revenue from just 3% in 2024.
— Sam
IPO Summer Scaries
QNT, TradeXYZ’s second pre-IPO market, is a full-stack quantum computing company developing quantum hardware and software for use cases across cybersecurity, chemistry, materials science, AI, and optimization.
Pre-IPO sentiment on TradeXYZ initially mirrored CBRS, where the market launched at a $175 reference price, repriced toward $360 by the final minute before Nasdaq opened, and finished only 2.8% above the eventual $350 opening print, far closer than the initial $115-$125 IPO range had implied.
Traders treated QNT similarly, pricing the perp well above the eventual IPO level before a live equity anchor existed. The market traded around $94.20 on June 2 and peaked near $113, implying an even larger premium to the eventual $60 IPO price. But unlike CBRS, QNT did not validate the pre-IPO signal. The stock opened at $68, almost 40% below the peak TradeXYZ level, and has since faded to the mid-$50s.

And if Hyperliquid pre-IPOs are any indication of what is coming, there may be more pain ahead. SpaceX, arguably the most anticipated potential IPO, has also started to reprice lower. For the first time, a TradeXYZ pre-IPO market is trading below its initial reference price, with SpaceX around $164, implying a roughly $2.1T valuation. That is down sharply from its $230 peak, though still above the proposed $135 IPO price.
Regardless, this will be a big week, with SpaceX’s IPO expected on Friday, June 12. If SpaceX follows the same pattern as CBRS and QNT, launch-day volume could expand by roughly 20x to 70x versus its pre-launch daily average. Based on SpaceX’s observed pre-launch volume of about $16.9M per day, that implies potential IPO-day volume of roughly $350M to $1.2B, with a midpoint estimate near $780M.

— Shaunda


Blockworks Advisory profiled Reflect, a permissionless system for yield-bearing stablecoins without a custodial operator: strategies run onchain with atomic mint/redeem and an API that ships in days, not months. Its edge leans on the SEC's April 2026 staff statement, which sets eleven conditions for non-custodial interfaces to skip broker-dealer registration, with custody and trade discretion disqualifying.
Its first tokens, USDC+ and USDT+, route idle USDC and USDT into five whitelisted Solana lenders, scoring each into a Basel 3-style capital ratio that haircuts yield for protocol and liquidation risk. Together, USDC and USDT are $12.2B, 74% of Solana's stablecoin supply.

Ethereum’s issuance debate is ultimately about how much the network should pay for security and what tradeoffs come with that choice. Supporters of changing the curve argue Ethereum may be overpaying for security, that high staking rewards could push too much ETH into custodial or institutional staking channels, and that a clearer issuance target would strengthen ETH’s monetary credibility. Opponents argue the risks are not yet well modeled, that lower rewards could hurt solo stakers and DeFi liquidity first, and that monetary policy stability may be more valuable than marginal optimization. The key point is that neither path is risk-free: keeping issuance unchanged may entrench high staking participation and LST dominance, while changing it could disrupt validator economics, DeFi collateral markets, and Ethereum’s credibility if handled poorly.
DAS is back!
Crypto's premier institutional event returns this fall in Singapore & London. Grab your seat in the most important room in the industry today.

